What they did
The poster, u/dr_lm, runs a university MSc dissertation module and has to track students, supervisors, offered projects, ranked project choices, examiners and final grades, with rules such as supervisors never marking their own students. The data arrives as CSV exports from Microsoft Forms, the student records system and Moodle, each laid out differently and with names spelled inconsistently. Because the records hold student names, emails and unpublished research ideas, the poster would not send them to a cloud model. Instead they ran Qwen 3.8 Flash Next locally on a vLLM backend inside the opencode agent, sandboxed in a Docker container with read-only access to the input files, write access to a workspace, Python, pypdf, LibreOffice and a venv. The agent designed a SQLite database, wrote an ingest step that loads every CSV, and kept a file of manual corrections so the database can be rebuilt from the sources at any time. It also wrote a script that turns the database into a Word booklet of the projects on offer.
How it went
The poster says it worked and that, for this job, it was no worse than the cloud agent (Codex) they normally use. It was noticeably faster, since generating a booklet from the database takes a few seconds on local disk. It understood the requests, inferred next steps and fixed typos and grammar carried over from the form answers on every rebuild. Two other agent harnesses on the same model and backend, Hermes Agent and pi, kept running ahead without checking in and had to be reined back; opencode did not. No hours saved or error counts are given.
Worth knowing
The point here is privacy: nothing leaves the machine, which needs a GPU with a lot of memory. A commenter argued that institutional cloud accounts are already GDPR compliant and that off-the-shelf tools exist for academic matching, and noted that flash-size local models handle well-bounded jobs better than open-ended ones.